DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 & COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON WA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NRO7137-13
11 March 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel. Command (NEC)
memo of 5420 Ser 91/219 of ay a copy of which was
provided to you on Pg You had the opportunity to
respond, but failed to do so.
Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. Therefore, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, t
demonstrate the existence oO
injustice.
Docket No .NRO7137-13
he burden is on the applicant to
£ probable material error or
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8554 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO8554-13 > official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8223 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted o£ your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO8223-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8259 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO8259-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8557 13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0326 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO0O0326-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5928 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ' application on 10 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. regularity attaches to all official records... Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No .NRO5928-13 official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8578-13
application for correction Of - your naval record pursuant | to ‘the. provisions of 10 usc L5S20° A three-member panel Of “the ‘Board for Correction of Naval “Records, sitting in executive session, considered ‘your —. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8634 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice in your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket Mo.NRO8634-13 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7472 13
Documentary material considered by of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determ copy of which was consideration of the idence submitted was probable material ination, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for iously considered by ortant to keep in mind to all official a correction of...